Scribble

Live blog of opinions | April 17, 2018

This live blog features discussion of the opinions in three argued cases that were released today -- Sessions v. Dimaya, Wilson v. Sellers and United States v. Microsoft.

3rd & 7 37yd

Good morning and welcome to our live blog.

by Andrew Hamm 4/17/2018 1:43:54 PM
Good morning, everyone! It's a cold and gloomy day here at the Court.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 1:47:04 PM
Thank you Andrew, good morning :)

by Nason 4/17/2018 1:47:41 PM
We are expecting one or more opinions in argued cases this morning. As is almost always the case, we don't know which opinions or how many.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 1:48:22 PM
Good morning Amy and Andrew! Here too in Michigan, snowy! Correct me if I am wrong, the Supreme Court agreed to release the audio recording for Hawaii v Trump oral argument couple hours after its conclusion, correct?

by Al 4/17/2018 1:48:29 PM
Random question, how do you guys know what days we might get opinions?

by Is it spring yet? 4/17/2018 1:48:59 PM
What is the real deal with Justice Kennedy's law clerk hiring? I read at Above the Law that he has hired 4 new clerks for next term, but read a different article that he has only hired 1. Any more information?

by John 4/17/2018 1:51:48 PM
"The justices once again did not act in Azar v. Garza" You must have that on a hotkey by now.

by Electric Dragon 4/17/2018 1:53:03 PM
Two boxes today!

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 1:54:08 PM
by Andrew Hamm 4/17/2018 1:54:29 PM
For those of you who are new or new-ish here, the number of boxes is a rough proxy for how many opinions we might get.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 1:54:31 PM
Any idea what's taking Garza so long? It's been since November when it was filed, and they've had the record for weeks now.

by Nathan Curtiss 4/17/2018 1:54:32 PM
by Andrew Hamm 4/17/2018 1:54:53 PM
Just heard the five-minute buzzer.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 1:54:57 PM
iirc you did a special livefeed during the Obergefell oral argument. Anything like that planned for Trump v. Hawaii, or will you let the audio recording do the job?

by James 4/17/2018 1:55:02 PM
Who decides on the early audio release? The clerk? It seems so subjective and lacking in neutrality when the court declares in advance in this way that it has determined a case to be more important than another.

by Yes it's spring. 4/17/2018 1:55:51 PM
@AndrewHamm What if we're here every blog day for all opinions?

by Nathan Curtiss 4/17/2018 1:55:56 PM
Are you able to blog inside the courtroom, or is there a media room nearby?

by Jason 4/17/2018 1:56:40 PM
2 boxes = ~ how many opinions?

by Zach 4/17/2018 1:57:20 PM
How soon after a hearing are audio recordings available? I'm here for South Dakota v. Wayfair.

by Ryan 4/17/2018 1:57:52 PM
Headed in to wait for opinions.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 1:58:24 PM
The waiting is the hardest part.

by VictimOrTheCrime 4/17/2018 2:02:03 PM
First opinion is Sessions v. Dimaya, from Kagan.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:02:18 PM
It is a long decision, and the holding is complicated.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:02:28 PM
It is (and I am summarizing this broadly, because there are a lot of opinions) 5-4: Kaqan, Breyer, Sotomayor, Ginsburg, and Gorsuch.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:03:29 PM
The lower court's judgment is affirmed.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:03:49 PM
The Court holds that the residual clause of Section 16 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, which defines an aggravated felony to include a "crime of violence," is unconstitutionally vague.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:04:35 PM
Here is a link to the opinion in Sessions v. Dimaya. Kevin Johnson of UC Davis School of Law will have our analysis:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/15-1498_1b8e.pdf

by Andrew Hamm 4/17/2018 2:05:13 PM
This follows on the Court's decision in Johnson v. United States in 2015, holding that a similar provision in the Armed Criminal Career Act was also unconstitutional.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:05:18 PM
Gorsuch has a separate opinion concurring in part and in the judgment.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:05:39 PM
Roberts dissents, joined by Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito. Thomas also has a dissenting opinion joined by Kennedy and Alito.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:06:08 PM
Prof. Johnson seems to predicted this result. www.scotusblog.com

by krs 4/17/2018 2:07:01 PM
Breyer has the ruling in Wilson v. Sellers, a federal habeas case.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:07:16 PM
The decision of the 11th Circuit is reversed and remanded.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:07:34 PM
The vote is 6-3.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:07:46 PM
The court holds that a federal habeas court reviewing an unexplained state-court decision on the merits should "look through" that decision to the last related state-court decision that provides a relevant rationale and then presume that the unexplained decision adopted the same reasoning. The state can rebut that presumption by showing that the unexplained decision most likely relied on different grounds that the reasoned decision below.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:08:57 PM
Here is a link to the opinion in Wilson v. Sellers. Steve Vladeck from Texas Law will have our analysis:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-6855_c18e.pdf

by Andrew Hamm 4/17/2018 2:09:41 PM
Aren't opinions issued in order of seniority?

by Ben 4/17/2018 2:09:49 PM
The justices have a short 3-page per curiam in US v. Microsoft.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:10:00 PM
Here is the opinion in US v. Microsoft. Amy will have our analysis:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/17-2_1824.pdf

by Andrew Hamm 4/17/2018 2:11:01 PM
The Court holds that because the president has signed the CLOUD Act, which provides (among other things) that an e-mail service provider must disclose communications even when they are located outside the United States, there is no longer a live dispute between the parties.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:11:09 PM
Therefore, the Second Circuit's decision is vacated; the court is sending the cases back to the lower court with instructions to vacate the district court's orders and then to direct the district court to dismiss the case as moot.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:11:58 PM
This is not a big surprise given the passage of the CLOUD Act and the briefs filed by the US and Microsoft. It is the last opinion of the day; they are now moving on to bar admissions and then oral arguments.

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:12:30 PM
So this means that there are only 2 opinions left from October oral arguments? And the only 2 Justices that have not yet written for October are Kennedy and...?

by Ashley Falls 4/17/2018 2:12:51 PM
Now that all Nov cases are decided, does Kennedy, Roberts, and Gorsuch not offering opinions from that month make them more likely to write for the Dec. and April sittings?

by MarkV 4/17/2018 2:13:55 PM
Bloomberg is reporting that Justice Sotomayor broke her shoulder

by Evan Lee 4/17/2018 2:14:40 PM
Okay, that's all we have for today. We'll have more on today's decisions, as well as more on today's oral arguments, later on. And we expect to be back here for a live blog and opinions tomorrow. Thanks so much for joining us today!

by Amy Howe 4/17/2018 2:16:48 PM
Thank you to everyone for joining us today. I'm shutting the live blog down now.

by Andrew Hamm 4/17/2018 2:29:52 PM

Featured Posts

Whitaker appointment dispute reaches Supreme Court – Steve Vladeck

Justices to weigh in on evidence in census citizenship-question dispute – Amy Howe

Relist Watch – John Elwood
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
The Supreme Court will release orders from the November 16 conference on Monday at 9:30 a.m; John Elwood’s Relist Watch compiles the petitions that were relisted for this conference.
The calendar for the December sitting, which will begin on Monday, November 26, is available on the Supreme Court’s website.
Recent Decisions
- Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido State and local governments are covered employers under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 regardless of the number of employees they have.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
- Andersen v. Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri Whether the provisions of the Medicaid Act that require participating states to include in their plans the ability of eligible individuals to obtain services from any “qualified” provider, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(23), but grant states broad authority to exclude providers for violating state or federal requirements, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(p), indicate that Congress clearly and unambiguously intended to create an implied private right of action to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is not “qualified” under the applicable state regulations.
- City of Escondido, California v. Emmons (1) Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred in denying the officers qualified immunity by considering clearly established law at too high a level of generality rather than giving particularized consideration to the facts and circumstances of this case; (2) whether the lower court erred in denying the officers qualified immunity by relying on a single decision, published after the event in question, to support its conclusion that qualified immunity is not available; and (3) whether the lower court erred in failing or refusing to decide whether the subject arrest was without probable cause or subject to qualified immunity.
- Fleck v. Wetch (1) Whether it violates the First Amendment for state law to presume that the petitioner consents to subsidizing non-chargeable speech by the group he is compelled to fund (an “opt-out” rule), as opposed to an “opt-in” rule whereby the petitioner must affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech; and (2) whether Keller v. State Bar of California and Lathrop v. Donohue should be overruled insofar as they permit the state to force the petitioner to join a trade association he opposes as a condition of earning a living in his chosen profession.
More Petitions »
Major Cases
- In re Department of Commerce
  Whether, in an action seeking to set aside agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., a district court may order discovery outside the administrative record to probe the mental processes of the agency decisionmaker—including by compelling the testimony of high-ranking Executive Branch officials—when there is no evidence that the decisionmaker disbelieved the objective reasons in the administrative record, irreversibly prejudged the issue, or acted on a legally forbidden basis.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  (1) Whether a 93-year-old memorial to the fallen of World War I is unconstitutional merely because it is shaped like a cross; (2) whether the constitutionality of a passive display incorporating religious symbolism should be assessed under the tests articulated in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Van Orden v. Perry, Town of Greece v. Galloway or some other test; and (3) whether, if the test from Lemon v. Kurtzman applies, the expenditure of funds for the routine upkeep and maintenance of a cross-shaped war memorial, without more, amounts to an excessive entanglement with religion in violation of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause.
- Timbs v. Indiana
  Whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause is incorporated against the states under the Fourteenth Amendment.
- Apple Inc. v. Pepper
  Whether consumers may sue anyone who delivers goods to them for antitrust damages, even when they seek damages based on prices set by third parties who would be the immediate victims of the alleged offense.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 22

Cases decided 1

Summary reversals 0

Merits cases granted to date 55

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Full Calendar Submit Event

Nov. 2018

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
				1	2 Conference	3
4	5 Orders STURGEON V. FROST (17-949) VIRGINIA URANIUM INC. V. WARREN (16-1275)	6 BUCKLEW V. PRECYTHE (17-8151) BNSF RAILWAY CO. V. LOOS (17-1042) Opinions	7 REPUBLIC OF SUDAN V. HARRISON (16-1094) CULBERTSON V. BERRYHILL (17-773)	8 Investiture Ceremony for Justice Brett Kavanaugh	9 Conference	10
11	12 Holiday	13 Orders	14	15	16 Conference	17
18	19	20	21	22 Holiday	23	24
25	26 Orders APPLE INC. V. PEPPER (17-204) NIEVES V. BARTLETT (17-1174)	27 NUTRACEUTICAL CORP. V. LAMBERT (17-1094) CARPENTER V. MURPHY (17-1107)	28 TIMBS V. INDIANA (17-1091)	29	30 Conference

Orders/Opinions
Arguments
Conferences

Events
Holidays
Multiple

Download our App in the Apple Store
First Mondays see all
Videos see all

Justice Kagan at Georgetown

On October 24 at Georgetown University Law Center, Justice Elena Kagan spoke about pro bono and public service and other topics with the Bob Carlson of the American Bar Association.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.