Scribble

Editor's Note :

Scribble

Opinion analysis: An extremely narrow Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ruling – Danielle D'Onfro

Argument analysis: Justices seem receptive to inmate’s juror-discrimination claims – Amy Howe

Opinion analysis: Justices sidestep decision on propriety of "cy pres" class-action settlements – Ronald Mann

Live blog of opinions | June 22, 2018 (with First Mondays)

Live blog of opinions | June 22, 2018 (with First Mondays)

We live-blogged as the Supreme Court released opinions in Carpenter v. United States, Currier v. Virginia, Ortiz v. United States and WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. Guest bloggers from First Mondays joined us from 9 to 9:45 a.m.

We live-blogged as the Supreme Court released opinions in Carpenter v. United States, Currier v. Virginia, Ortiz v. United States and WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. Guest bloggers from First Mondays joined us from 9 to 9:45 a.m.

Mar. 2019

Featured Posts

Sponsored by Casetext

SCOTUStalk see all

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

Major Cases

Recent Decisions

Current Relists

Recent Special Features

Live Blog Archives

Mar. 2019

Download our App in the Apple Store

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award

Conference of March 15, 2019

3rd & 7 37yd

Let's get this party started! Coming at you live from STL MO. Any St. Louisans in the house?

by Dan Epps 6/22/2018 1:00:22 PM
Good morning, everyone, and welcome back! The Supreme Court will release more opinions at 10:00am today; until then, we'll be live-blogging and taking your questions. I'm Ian Samuel, a lecturer at Harvard Law School (and soon-to-be professor at Indiana University), and co-host of First Mondays.

by Ian Samuel 6/22/2018 1:00:34 PM
So....considering everything this term, how does this sound for a likely lineup? The February seems hardest to predict at this point, as it depends on what the actual decision says.

Roberts - Carpenter
Breyer - Florida
Kagan - Dalmazzi

Janus - Alito, Ginsburg, or Gorsuch
Ohio - Ginsburg, Alito, or Kagan
Currier - Thomas, Kagan, or Ginsburg

Thomas - NIFLA
Roberts - Trump
Thomas - Abbott
Alito - WesternGeco

by Greg 6/22/2018 1:01:00 PM
Just saw that Justice Thomas is meeting with Pence today at lunch. Is that normal? Any chance he's sharing some big news?

by AH 6/22/2018 1:02:32 PM
As a newly subscribe amicus to First Mondays, it's been really cool following the live blog with you guys this week!

by mpgronseth 6/22/2018 1:02:59 PM
How rare is a third opinion day in a week? More to my concern: is SCOTUS being exceptionally slow this term? If so, why? There also seems to be more punting than usual. I’d appreciate it if you could share a hypothesis-explanation.

by Hugo 6/22/2018 1:04:00 PM
Waiting for Carptener, Janus, & the other biggies like…

by Ian Samuel 6/22/2018 1:04:13 PM
Are there just opinions today, or opinions and orders?

by Jay Riestenberg 6/22/2018 1:04:39 PM
If Carpenter is not issued today, what should 4A nerds do this weekend to alleviate their disappointment?

by APD 6/22/2018 1:05:27 PM
Are the potential decisions for Janus as wild as they could be or do you believe it will fall somewhere in the middle? What is most likely to least likely?

by Scott Sternal 6/22/2018 1:06:30 PM
So Dan is punting on the punting question?

by INFINITE GLORY 6/22/2018 1:07:05 PM
Good Morning Blog.

by Eric Citron 6/22/2018 1:08:16 PM
IF we were to get a retirement announcement next week, when would you estimate Trump would announce his nominee?

by ByeSCOTUS 6/22/2018 1:08:19 PM
If the Court adds additional opinion days next week when is the earliest we will know?

by AP 6/22/2018 1:08:32 PM
Interesting article on Slate about Kagan today. Interesting premise is that some of her votes with the conservatives may be to ameliorate what would be harder rulings.

slate.com

by Chris In England 6/22/2018 1:09:34 PM
so... assuming gorsuch does have weird views on janus and is writing for the liberals.... what do you think he'd actually be saying?

by ar 6/22/2018 1:09:43 PM
When do the justices' clerks wrap up their clerkships? Do they hold down the fort while their bosses are touring Europe or are they done in early July too?

by G 6/22/2018 1:11:03 PM
Why do you think they didn't issue an opinion on the Texas gerrymandering case when they did the others on Monday? Do you think they will also punt this one as well?

by TheIntern 6/22/2018 1:11:27 PM
#WaitingForLeah

by cwgivens21 6/22/2018 1:12:20 PM
The Court is holding at least a few third-party doctrine cases for Carpenter. Are those likely to be GVR'd?

by Sally 6/22/2018 1:12:45 PM
My memory from reading this blog is that on the second-to-last day, the Chief usually announces that the term will conclude on the next opinion day, e.g., [We stand adjourned until Monday] at which point we will adjourn for the remainder of [OT 18].

by LegalBySegal 6/22/2018 1:13:10 PM
What are your hours like as a Supreme Court clerk? How much does it vary by chambers?

by Matt 6/22/2018 1:14:00 PM
Also, glad you're sporting the avatar from the start, Ian. You're growing up.

by G 6/22/2018 1:14:04 PM
With so many many cases, shouldn't the justices have more clerks? Is there a limit?

by SwanMan 6/22/2018 1:14:26 PM
Please speculate wildly for me and give me your guesses on number of boxes and opinions today.

by G 6/22/2018 1:15:14 PM
Following the liveblog on opinion days counts as studying in law school, right?

by zobo 6/22/2018 1:15:48 PM
If we don’t get Carpenter today I’m starting a riot.

by Nate Riley 6/22/2018 1:16:18 PM
I'm applying for CLE credits for following the liveblog.

by LegalBySegal 6/22/2018 1:16:34 PM
Which justices work their clerks the hardest?

by guest 6/22/2018 1:16:46 PM
how well, if at all, do you get to know the other justices when you're clerking?

by ar 6/22/2018 1:16:55 PM
Has your mind changed with regards to AMK retirement given Rick Hasen's tweets on Gill?

by Auer 6/22/2018 1:17:14 PM
Bigger deal: Kennedy inviting a challenge to clarify Chevron, or Alito arguing vigorously that it should have been applied?

by AP 6/22/2018 1:18:37 PM
Of what's left, which opinion is each of you most interested in?

by G 6/22/2018 1:19:26 PM
It's true the number of argued cases is manageable or low, but I assumed not being in the cert pool meant more work and maybe having a fifth clerk would be reasonable.

by SwanMan 6/22/2018 1:20:15 PM
You set yourself up for this Q, Dan: which say no? Who are the cranks? Who’s shy?

by Hugo 6/22/2018 1:21:29 PM
Dan and Ian, love you, love the show, keep doing great work. Ian, how are you enjoying Hoosier life (assuming you are there)? I'll hang up and listen for my answer. Thanks!

by Phil 6/22/2018 1:22:27 PM
Just a reminder: we don't know what opinions are coming today. All we can do is speculate. We're just as eager as all of you to find out at 10AM Eastern!

by Dan Epps 6/22/2018 1:22:46 PM
can you explain what the 'cert pool' is?

by Chris In England 6/22/2018 1:22:48 PM
If we don't get all the opinions by next Monday, I'm starting a riot

by Jos Malig-on 6/22/2018 1:23:11 PM
Who got to keep the Souter note?

by EKNY 6/22/2018 1:23:28 PM
Is it common for opinions to come out on Friday? I'm an intern and have been assigned to track the opinions as they come out, and had only been following the blog on Mondays! Hope I didn't miss anything ...

by AG 6/22/2018 1:25:04 PM
Totally a not legal Q - how big is the back-house non-legal staff of SCOTUS? Big? Small? Pretty distinct from the legal staff?

by Ben F 6/22/2018 1:25:59 PM
Back to Gill, earlier this week. It seems to me that Chief Justice Roberts fatally wounded the "efficiency gap", but no one has noticed yet...

Consider that the "efficiency gap" ("EG") does not work for single districts. (For example, a very competitive district with a split of 51% party A and 49% party B would have an off the charts high EG of 48%, whereas a grotesquely packed district of 75% party A and 25% party B would have an ideal EG of 0%, which is the opposite of how the EG has been advertised...)

Any thoughts?

by kramartini 6/22/2018 1:26:14 PM
I've seen a lot of prognostication that puts Thomas as the one writing Abbott. What do y'all think is the chance that the court rules for Perez?

by AntCon 6/22/2018 1:26:26 PM
Where do each of you tend to fall on the political spectrum? More liberal, more conservative?

by Chris in TX 6/22/2018 1:27:17 PM

Featured Posts

Opinion analysis: An extremely narrow Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ruling – Danielle D'Onfro

Argument analysis: Justices seem receptive to inmate’s juror-discrimination claims – Amy Howe

Opinion analysis: Justices sidestep decision on propriety of "cy pres" class-action settlements – Ronald Mann
Sponsored by Casetext
SCOTUStalk see all
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
The Supreme Court will release orders from the March 22 conference on Monday at 9:30 a.m.; John Elwood's Relist Watch compiles the petitions that were relisted for this conference.
There is a possibility of opinions on Tuesday and Wednesday.
On Monday, the justices hear oral argument in PDR Network, LLC v. Carlton & Harris Chiropractic Inc. and The Dutra Group v. Batterton.
On Tuesday, the justices hear oral argument in Rucho v. Common Cause and Lamone v. Benisek.
On Wednesday, the justices hear oral argument in Kisor v. Wilkie.
On Friday, the justices meet for their March 29 conference.
Major Cases
- Lamone v. Benisek
  In case in which the plaintiffs allege that a Maryland congressional district was gerrymandered to retaliate against them for their political views: (1) whether the various legal claims articulated by the three-judge district court are unmanageable; (2) whether the three-judge district court erred when, in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, it resolved disputes of material fact as to multiple elements of plaintiffs’ claims, failed to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and treated as “undisputed” evidence that is the subject of still-unresolved hearsay and other evidentiary objections; and (3) whether the three-judge district court abused its discretion in entering an injunction despite the plaintiffs’ years-long delay in seeking injunctive relief, rendering the remedy applicable to at most one election before the next decennial census necessitates another redistricting.
- Kisor v. Wilkie
  Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., which direct courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation.
- Rucho v. Common Cause
  (1) Whether plaintiffs have standing to press their partisan gerrymandering claims; (2) whether plaintiffs’ partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable; and (3) whether North Carolina’s 2016 congressional map is, in fact, an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York, New York
  Whether New York City’s ban on transporting a licensed, locked and unloaded handgun to a home or shooting range outside city limits is consistent with the Second Amendment, the commerce clause and the constitutional right to travel.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  (1) Whether a 93-year-old memorial to the fallen of World War I is unconstitutional merely because it is shaped like a cross; (2) whether the constitutionality of a passive display incorporating religious symbolism should be assessed under the tests articulated in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Van Orden v. Perry, Town of Greece v. Galloway or some other test; and (3) whether, if the test from Lemon v. Kurtzman applies, the expenditure of funds for the routine upkeep and maintenance of a cross-shaped war memorial, without more, amounts to an excessive entanglement with religion in violation of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Decisions
- Frank v. Gaos This class action settlement case is remanded for the courts below to address the plaintiffs’ standing in light of Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins.
- Obduskey v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP A business engaged in no more than nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings is not a “debt collector” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, except for the limited purpose of enforcing security interests under 15 U. S. C. §1692f(6).
- Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DeVries In the maritime tort context, a product manufacturer has a duty to warn when its product requires incorporation of a part, the manufacturer knows or has reason to know that the integrated product is likely to be dangerous for its intended uses, and the manufacturer has no reason to believe that the product’s users will realize that danger.
- Nielsen v. Preap The judgments of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit -- that respondents, who are deportable for certain specified crimes, are not subject to 8 U. S. C. §1226(c)(2)’s mandatory-detention requirement because they were not arrested by immigration officials as soon as they were released from jail -- are reversed, and the cases are remanded.
- Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den Inc. The Supreme Court of Washington’s judgment -- that the “right to travel” provision of the 1855 Treaty Between the United States and the Yakama Nation of Indians pre-empts the state’s fuel tax as applied to Cougar Den’s importation of fuel by public highway for sale within the reservation -- is affirmed.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
- Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda Whether the prohibition in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), against employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” encompasses discrimination based on an individual’s sexual orientation.
- Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia Whether discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2.
- Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition.
More Petitions »
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 52

Cases decided 26

Summary reversals 4

Merits cases granted to date 74

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Full Calendar Submit Event

Orders/Opinions
Arguments
Conferences

Events
Holidays
Multiple

Download our App in the Apple Store
Videos see all

Justice Sotomayor and Eva Longoria Bastón

On March 1, Justice Sonia Sotomayor spoke with actress Eva Longoria Bastón about Sotomayor’s life, her new children’s book and more.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

Cases argued	52
Cases decided	26
Summary reversals	4
Merits cases granted to date	74

1
Conference

4
Orders
Opinions

15
Conference

18
Orders
VIRGINIA HOUSE OF DELEGATES V. BETHUNE-HILL (18-281)
SMITH V. BERRYHILL (17-1606)

19
COCHISE CONSULTANCY INC. V. U.S., EX REL. HUNT (18-315)
Opinions

20
FLOWERS V. MISSISSIPPI (17-9572)
Opinions

22
Conference

25
Orders
PDR NETWORK, LLC V. CARLTON & HARRIS CHIROPRACTIC INC. (17-1705)
THE DUTRA GROUP V. BATTERTON (18-266)

26
RUCHO V. COMMON CAUSE (18-422)
LAMONE V. BENISEK (18-726)
Opinions

27
KISOR V. WILKIE (18-15)
Opinions

29
Conference