Scribble

Editor's Note :

Scribble

Empirical SCOTUS: The hottest bench in town – Adam Feldman

Argument preview: Justices to consider competency in capital cases – Amy Howe

Argument preview: Justices face nondelegation challenge to federal sex-offender registration law – Mila Sohoni

Live blog of orders and opinions | June 25, 2018 (with John Elwood and First Mondays)

Live blog of orders and opinions | June 25, 2018 (with John Elwood and First Mondays)

We live-blogged as the Supreme Court released orders from the June 21 conference (9:30 a.m.) and opinions in argued cases (10 a.m.). The justices added seven new cases to their merits docket for next term. The justices announced their decisions in Abbott v. Perez and Ohio v. American Express Co. Guest bloggers from First Mondays and John Elwood of Relist Watch also joined us.

Featured Posts

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

This Week at the Court

Major Cases

Recent Special Features

Statistical Snapshot

Live Blog Archives

Twitter Feed

Calendar: September 2018

Sept. 2018

Download our App in the Apple Store

First Mondays see all

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award

Holiday

Conference

Orders

3rd & 7 37yd

We have the second and final decision of the day. It is Ohio v. AmeEx, it is from Justice Thomas, and it is affirmed.

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:11:24 PM
The vote is 5-4, with Breyer writing the dissent.

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:11:40 PM
This is an antitrust case, in which a group of states are challenging a provision in the contract between American Express and the merchants that accept its cards; the provision bars the merchants from trying to steer their customers to use a particular credit card. The main issues before the court were twofold. First, at what market should courts look at in a case like this: Just at the merchants, or at the merchants and the cardholders? Second, if courts look at both the merchants and the cardholders as the market, do the plaintiffs have to show that both sides are harmed by the provision?

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:11:50 PM
The Court holds that Amex's steering provisions do not violate federal antitrust law.

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:12:12 PM
Here's the opinion in Ohio v. American Express. Beth Farmer will have our analysis:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1454_5h26.pdf

by Andrew Hamm 6/25/2018 2:12:51 PM
Court defines the market as two-sided, including both merchants and cardholders. When the market is defined this way, the Court says, it is clear that the plaintiffs have not met their burden to show anti-competitive effects.

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:15:41 PM
Breyer, a former antitrust law professor, is reading his dissent from the bench. This means we will have to wait some more to hear when the court will be back.

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:16:30 PM
Going to bet that 1 box means no Janus

by Greg 6/25/2018 2:16:50 PM
Good news of the day: we get to spend at least one more morning with Amy.

by David 6/25/2018 2:18:18 PM
Does Justice Breyer misspell laissez faire in the opening line of his dissent...?

by Col. Mustard 6/25/2018 2:19:09 PM
Doesn’t Justice Breyer speak French?

by Guest 6/25/2018 2:20:07 PM
So do we meet again here tomorrow?

by Scott 6/25/2018 2:21:09 PM
So, if we get only one more opinion day, there are going to be 3 significant cases. Janus, Hawaii, and NIFLA. So much for the conventional wisdom that they spread out big decisions

by Matt 6/25/2018 2:22:49 PM
Where can we access the transcripts of the opinions/dissents read from the bench on decision days?

by guest 6/25/2018 2:23:15 PM
Do we think Kennedy will announce a retirement today?

by Brandon 6/25/2018 2:23:40 PM
Was AMEX controversial? Is it odd that Thomas wrote it?

by KPOM 6/25/2018 2:24:09 PM
Tomorrow we will have more opinions. They did not announce that tomorrow will be the next day, so it looks like we get to do this again at least twice!

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:24:47 PM
@Col.Mustard laissez means "allow" and lassez means to grow weary. I doubt it was a pun, but the spelling is perhaps Freudian.

by Dave H. 6/25/2018 2:25:16 PM
What will happen with petitions that had been relisted and are not on today's orders list?

by CDK 6/25/2018 2:27:18 PM
They have finished releasing decisions for today. We will be back again tomorrow! I'm going to get to work now, but hopefully others will stick around to answer questions.

by Amy Howe 6/25/2018 2:30:45 PM
So 2 more days for decisions this week?

by Paul Catorce 6/25/2018 2:31:02 PM
Any idea when the 'clean up' conference might take place and approximately when the order list from that conference will be released?

by PJK 6/25/2018 2:35:28 PM
Does Alito's writing the gerrymandering case say anything about his writing (or not) Janus?

by Glenn 6/25/2018 2:37:19 PM
I'm very surprised at how Ohio came out. I just re-listened to the argument Saturday and would have sworn it was going to go for Ohio.

by Ohio 6/25/2018 2:38:12 PM
I'm outta here. See y'all later.

by Tejinder 6/25/2018 2:38:23 PM
Hi all, that's all for this morning. We'll be back tomorrow and at least one other day this week (Wednesday?).

by Andrew Hamm 6/25/2018 2:41:20 PM
Already this morning I posted the latest First Mondays podcast -- and thanks to Dan, Ian, and Leah for joining us again.

by Andrew Hamm 6/25/2018 2:41:45 PM
Today we'll have Amy writing on this morning's orders and on Abbott v. Perez, the racial gerrymandering case from Texas. Beth Farmer will write on the antitrust decision, Ohio v. AmEx. And Mark Walsh will provide a "view" from the courtroom.

by Andrew Hamm 6/25/2018 2:42:34 PM
If we didn't get to your question or comment -- sorry about that and hopefully we can tomorrow!

by Andrew Hamm 6/25/2018 2:42:54 PM

Featured Posts

Empirical SCOTUS: The hottest bench in town – Adam Feldman

Argument preview: Justices to consider competency in capital cases – Amy Howe

Argument preview: Justices face nondelegation challenge to federal sex-offender registration law – Mila Sohoni
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
On Monday, the justices met for their September 24 conference. We expect orders from this conference on Thursday. The October 2018 term will begin on Monday, October 1. The calendar for the October sitting is available on the court's website.
Major Cases
- Trump v. Hawaii
  The president has lawfully exercised the broad discretion granted to him under 8 U. S. C. §1182(f) to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States; respondents have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that Presidential Proclamation No. 9645 violates the establishment clause.
- South Dakota v. Wayfair Inc.
  Quill Corp. v. North Dakota and National Bellas Hess Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Illinois -- which held that a state cannot require an out-of-state seller with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit sales taxes on goods the seller ships to consumers in the state -- are overruled.
- Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31
  The state of Illinois’ extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violates the First Amendment; Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed., which concluded otherwise, is overruled.
- Gill v. Whitford
  Plaintiffs -- Wisconsin Democratic voters who rested their claim of unconstitutional partisan gerrymandering on statewide injury -- have failed to demonstrate Article III standing.
- Carpenter v. United States
  The government’s acquisition of Timothy Carpenter’s cell-site records from his wireless carriers was a Fourth Amendment search; the government did not obtain a warrant supported by probable cause before acquiring those records.
- Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
  The Colorado Civil Rights Commission’s actions in assessing a cakeshop owner’s reasons for declining to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding celebration violated the free exercise clause.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 0

Cases decided 0

Summary reversals 0

Merits cases granted to date 37

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Calendar: September 2018
Full Calendar Submit Event

Sept. 2018

Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa

1

2

3
Holiday

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24
Conference

25

26

27
Orders

28

29

30
- Orders/Opinions
- Arguments
- Conferences
- Events
- Holidays
- Multiple

Download our App in the Apple Store
First Mondays see all
Videos see all

Six Connecticut judges remember arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court

Six current Connecticut judges argued before the U.S. Supreme Court between 1981 and 1991. Their recollections of those arguments – prepared by Judge Jon Blue of the Connecticut Superior Court for the annual Connecticut Judges Institute – present a portrait of the justices at work in an earlier era. Judge Julia DiCocco Dewey argued before the court […]

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

Cases argued	0
Cases decided	0
Summary reversals	0
Merits cases granted to date	37

24
Conference